Former NFL player Matt Kalil’s lawsuit against his ex-wife Haley Kalil has been dismissed after a federal judge rejected his attempt to hold the model and influencer liable for publicly discussing intimate details from their marriage.
Chief U.S. District Judge Patrick Schiltz sided with Haley in the privacy dispute, dismissing claims that grew out of a viral 2025 livestream in which she discussed the former couple’s sex life and described an extreme physical incompatibility as a major reason for their divorce.
Matt argued that his ex-wife crossed a legal line by disclosing intensely private information about his anatomy to a massive audience. His lawsuit accused Haley of public disclosure of private facts and unjust enrichment, alleging that the attention subjected him and his current family to ridicule while financially benefiting her social-media career.
The judge reached a different conclusion. Although the information Haley revealed was unusually personal, Schiltz found that she disclosed it while talking about her own marriage, health and divorce.
The Judge Said Haley Was Talking About Her Own Life
Schiltz’s ruling centered on one of the elements of a Minnesota public-disclosure privacy claim, whether the information at issue involved a matter of legitimate public concern.
The judge acknowledged that the result could have been different if Haley had simply been an unrelated social-media personality repeating intimate gossip about a retired football player. But Matt and Haley had been married for years, their relationship and divorce were already public, and Haley had developed a large audience independently of her former husband’s NFL career.
According to the ruling, Haley’s comments were part of a discussion about her own experience of the marriage, including the physical pain she said she endured and why the relationship ultimately failed.
Schiltz summarized the distinction directly: “Haley was discussing her life, not Matt’s.” He added that the law generally protects a person’s ability to speak about herself even when doing so inevitably reveals information about someone else.
The judge also rejected Matt’s unjust-enrichment claim. Matt argued that Haley financially benefited from the enormous attention surrounding the livestream through increased engagement, publicity and social-media traffic. Schiltz concluded that there was nothing legally unjust about Haley earning money from content that included statements she was entitled to make.
Haley told TMZ after the dismissal that she was relieved the case was over and said she hoped the ruling would encourage women to speak openly about their experiences. Her attorney, Matthew Bialick, said the court had dismissed every claim against her and argued that people should not need an ex-spouse’s permission to discuss their own relationships and bodies.
The Livestream Comment That Started the Lawsuit
— Xavier (@Xavierthe777) November 4, 2025
The legal fight traces back to Haley’s November 2025 appearance on streamer Marlon Garcia’s Twitch livestream. During a much longer conversation about her relationship history, she discussed her marriage to Matt while repeatedly describing him positively despite explaining why the relationship eventually became unsustainable.
The conversation then became considerably more intimate. Haley compared her former husband’s anatomy to “two Coke cans” stacked together, possibly even a third, and said their physical incompatibility made intercourse extremely painful. When Garcia asked whether that issue had been the biggest factor in the end of the marriage, Haley said that it had.
She also said the couple had tried to solve the problem instead of immediately giving up. According to Haley, they sought help from therapists and doctors and explored possible medical options before concluding that they could not overcome the physical incompatibility.
Haley complained that the viral clips stripped away the context of a much longer conversation in which she had also called Matt a good person, described him as her best friend and emphasized the affection she still had for him.
Matt Kalil Said the Viral Attention Went Far Beyond a Divorce Story
Matt filed his lawsuit in federal court on January 6th, 2026. His position was that being a former professional athlete did not give a former spouse unlimited permission to reveal intensely private sexual information. The former Minnesota Vikings offensive tackle argued that he had deliberately stepped away from public attention following his NFL career and had never consented to having those details broadcast to millions of people.
The alleged consequences extended beyond jokes and comments directed at him. Matt’s complaint said his current wife, Keilani Asmus, began receiving messages that became increasingly disturbing after Haley’s comments spread online.
His lawyers also argued that the dispute could not be reduced to Haley’s right to talk about herself. Their position was that an autobiographical account could still invade another person’s privacy when it disclosed highly intimate information about that person to a mass audience.
Matt sought damages exceeding $75,000 and requested a jury trial. Haley moved to dismiss the lawsuit on January 23rd, and Schiltz heard oral arguments on April 29th before taking the motion under advisement.
Haley Said She Never Named Matt During the Viral Comments
One point Haley emphasized while fighting the lawsuit was that she did not actually say Matt’s name during the portion of the livestream containing the comments at issue. Matt’s complaint argued that anyone familiar with Haley’s public relationship history could determine who she was discussing.
Haley’s attorneys turned that same fact into part of their defense. They argued that viewers could make the connection precisely because the Kalils’ marriage and divorce had already been public and because Haley herself had become a public figure with millions of followers interested in her personal life.
Her legal team also emphasized that the comments concerned Haley’s own body and the pain she said she experienced during the marriage. Schiltz ultimately found that context more significant than Matt’s argument that the anatomical information itself was too private to qualify as a subject of legitimate public concern.
Matt Had Already Remarried When Haley’s Comments Went Viral
View this post on Instagram
Matt and Haley married in 2015 and separated years later before Haley filed for divorce in May 2022. By the time the livestream took place in November 2025, both had moved into very different chapters of their lives. Matt married model Keilani Asmus in Las Vegas on April 13th, 2024. The couple later welcomed their first child together that year.
Haley, meanwhile, had become substantially more famous online than she had been during much of the marriage. After competing in pageants and appearing in Sports Illustrated Swimsuit, she built an audience numbering in the millions across TikTok and Instagram under the online name Haley Baylee. Schiltz concluded that her marriage, divorce and experiences inside that relationship were part of the personal story her followers legitimately followed.
Schiltz also acknowledged the joking tone Haley used during parts of the livestream, writing that at times she had the demeanor of someone telling a dirty joke.